These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 11663690

  • 1. Can technology solve the abortion dilemma?
    Maguire MR.
    Christ Century; 1976 Oct 27; 93(34):918-9. PubMed ID: 11663690
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reply to Sarah Burns.
    Colker R.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990 Oct 27; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
    Menon N.
    Can J Women Law; 1993 Oct 27; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg.
    Martin SL.
    Can J Women Law; 1993 Oct 27; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On abortion: a Lincolnian position.
    McKenna G.
    Atl Mon; 1995 Sep 27; 276(3):51-54, 56, 58-61, 64, 66-68. PubMed ID: 11660130
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change.
    Cavanagh D.
    Lib Life Fam; 1996 Sep 27; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Jewish views on abortion.
    Jakobovits I.
    Hum Life Rev; 1975 Sep 27; 1(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 11663541
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E.
    Free Inq; 2006 Sep 27; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The struggle for abortion rights in Canada.
    Morgentaler H.
    Free Inq; 2006 Sep 27; 9(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11654114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Abortion and morality revisited.
    Fox-Genovese E.
    Hum Life Rev; 1997 Sep 27; 23(3):50-9. PubMed ID: 11657121
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mother matters: a fresh look at prenatal genetic testing.
    Lippman A.
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992 Sep 27; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11653996
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. International protection of women's rights: an analysis of Open Door Counselling Ltd. and Dublin Well Woman Centre v. Ireland.
    Thompson A.
    Boston Univ Int Law J; 1994 Sep 27; 12():371-406. PubMed ID: 11656856
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
    Tapovatz WE.
    St Marys Law J; 1974 Sep 27; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
    Morris C.
    UCLA Womens Law J; 1997 Sep 27; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A realistic approach to maternal-fetal conflict.
    Hornstra D.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998 Sep 27; 28(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 11656772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The reluctance of the judiciary to balance competing interests: R. v. Morgentaler in the Ontario Court of Appeal.
    Martin SL.
    Can J Women Law; 1986 Sep 27; 1(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 11651102
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. "Grey gentlemen, young ladies, and the fetus in the maternal compartment": observations at the International Conference on "The Fetus as a Patient," Bonn, 24-26 August 1991.
    Schulze C.
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992 Sep 27; 5(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 11651334
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.