These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


775 related items for PubMed ID: 11663734

  • 21. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985 Aug; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses.
    Brown M.
    Neb Law Rev; 1993 Aug; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
    Fordham Law Rev; 1973 Aug; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt.
    Vance RP.
    LA Law Rev; 1974 Aug; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD.
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD.
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981 Sep; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion.
    Mahoney HM.
    America (NY); 1993 Oct 16; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
    Caron WR.
    Cathol Lawyer; 1982 Oct 16; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The "right" of abortion funding.
    Noonan JT.
    Hum Life Rev; 1981 Oct 16; 7(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 11651720
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. "But whoever treasures freedom...": the right to travel and extraterritorial abortions.
    Kreimer SF.
    Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar 16; 91(5):907-38. PubMed ID: 11656299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA.
    Temple Law Q; 1981 Mar 16; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.