These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


105 related items for PubMed ID: 11664151

  • 1. Obstructionist activities at abortion clinics: a framework for remedial litigation.
    Buren MA.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1978; 8(3):325-60. PubMed ID: 11664151
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
    Eller TR.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion clinic zoning: the right to procreative freedom and the zoning power.
    Robinson L.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1979; 5(4):283-99. PubMed ID: 11655470
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus.
    Sebek M.
    De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Constitutional law: Pennsylvania's wrongful birth statute's impact on abortion rights: state action and undue burden -- Edmonds v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital Radiology Associates.
    Silverman AM.
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1087-105. PubMed ID: 11659883
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
    Crockett KG, Hyman M.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Abortion: state action.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR.
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL, Ravenscraft P.
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Abortion.
    Utah.
    Utah Code Annot 1953 Utah; 1991; Section 76.7 Pt 3():. PubMed ID: 12043640
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
    Skahn SL.
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion.
    Louisiana.
    Revis Statut La; 1992; Sects. 14.87 to 14.88():7 to 14:88. PubMed ID: 12043685
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD.
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of mandatory delay laws on abortion patients and providers.
    Althaus FA, Henshaw SK.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994 Sep; 26(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 11656489
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E.
    Free Inq; 2006 Sep; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976 Sep; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Report regarding: Karlin et al. v. Foust et al., August 12, 1996.
    Jackson B.
    IRB; 1999 Sep; 14(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 11657968
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.