These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


158 related items for PubMed ID: 11664469

  • 1. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ.
    Sci News; 1975 Jul 12; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976 Jul 12; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976 Jul 12; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975 Jul 12; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976 Jul 12; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975 Jul 12; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.
    Siegel RA.
    Am Psychol; 1978 Sep 12; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep 12; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Involuntary psychiatry.
    Szasz TS.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976 Sep 12; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
    Jernigan LT.
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975 Sep 12; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976 Sep 12; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984 Sep 12; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Bernard JL.
    Am Psychol; 1977 Dec 12; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M.
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975 Dec 12; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. O'Connor v. Donaldson. 26 Jun 1975.
    U.S. Supreme Court.
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1975 Dec 12; 422():563-89. PubMed ID: 12038358
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976 Dec 12; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.
    Dowben C.
    Houst Law Rev; 1979 May 12; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976 May 12; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Constitutional law--individual rights and liberties of the mentally ill--constitutional protection--O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Prousalis TT.
    Howard Law J; 1976 May 12; 19(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 11662270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt.
    Friedman P.
    Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov 12; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.