These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

654 related items for PubMed ID: 11664510

  • 1. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court.
    Tarr RW.
    Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
    Stepanuk NA.
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response.
    Boyer BB.
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974.
    Kemp J.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct 17; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A drug addict's right to anonymity.
    DeSabato AA.
    Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar 17; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Policy-makers chip away at confidentiality protections.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug 20; 14(15 Bonus Report):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Privacy of medical records.
    Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation.
    Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov 20; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Medical privacy: threatened but fighting back.
    Patient Care; 1975 Jan 01; 9(1):108-109+. PubMed ID: 11661198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The HIV-AIDS epidemic and the child welfare system: protecting the rights of infants, young children, and adolescents.
    English A.
    Iowa Law Rev; 1992 May 01; 77(4):1509-60. PubMed ID: 11653374
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.
    Davis HR, Mitrius JV.
    Jurimetrics; 1996 May 01; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ethical aspects of genetic testing.
    Fruchtman CE, Pizzulli FC.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1998 May 01; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
    Bobinski MA.
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994 May 01; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A guide to the new federal rules governing the confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records.
    Helms DJ.
    Contemp Drug Probl; 1975 May 01; 4(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 11661264
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Privacy in personal medical information: a diagnosis.
    Newman S.
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1981 May 01; 33(3):394-424. PubMed ID: 11649692
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP.
    St Marys Law J; 1976 May 01; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.