These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 11664545

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The civilly-committed public mental patient and the right to aftercare.
    Saphire RB.
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 4(2):232-95. PubMed ID: 11664639
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
    Wallach S.
    Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG.
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983 Nov; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976 May; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
    Roberts TD.
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978 May; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA.
    Creighton Law Rev; 1978 May; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ.
    Sci News; 1975 Jul 12; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Amicus curiae brief in the Donaldson case.
    American Psychiatric Association.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1975 Jan 12; 132(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 11643354
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
    Meisel A.
    Law Contemp Probl; 1982 Jan 12; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--a state cannot constitutionally confine a nondangerous mentally ill individual,
    Blakely WD.
    J Urban Law; 1975 Jan 12; 53(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 11664557
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Constitutional law--involuntary commitment of nondangerous persons.
    Hakes PJ.
    Tulane Law Rev; 1976 Mar 12; 50(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 11664608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM.
    Touro Law Rev; 1991 Mar 12; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.