These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 11664557

  • 1. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--a state cannot constitutionally confine a nondangerous mentally ill individual,
    Blakely WD.
    J Urban Law; 1975; 53(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 11664557
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release.
    Burnstin SM.
    Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Constitutional law--involuntary commitment of nondangerous persons.
    Hakes PJ.
    Tulane Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 50(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 11664608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M.
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG.
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983 Mar; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC.
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976 Mar; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984 Mar; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976 Mar; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Involuntary psychiatry.
    Szasz TS.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ.
    Sci News; 1975 Jul 12; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment?
    Lipscomb NI.
    Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Jul 12; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
    Johnson RM, Wehrle-Einhorn RJ.
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974 Jul 12; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.