These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

437 related items for PubMed ID: 11666112

  • 1. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Payne SM, Snow RJ, Dierker L, Rosenthal GE.
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF, Malcoe LH.
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC, Shieh GR, Wu CS, Shen HC, Tang CH.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH, Wang HI, Hsu CS, Su HW, Chen MJ, Lin HC.
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct 09; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.
    Rosenthal GE, Baker DW, Norris DG, Way LE, Harper DL, Snow RJ.
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar 09; 34(7):1449-68. PubMed ID: 10737447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI, Capeless EC, Abel DE, Stuart GS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov 09; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit JL, Love TE, Dawson NV.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb 09; 194(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 16458637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.
    Holubkov R, Holt VL, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP.
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Aug 09; 33(3 Pt 1):531-48. PubMed ID: 9685121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A, Peterson MR.
    Birth; 2004 Dec 09; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records.
    Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Nelson JC, Cárdenas V, Gardella C, Easterling TR, Callaghan WM.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2005 Nov 09; 19(6):460-71. PubMed ID: 16269074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.
    Lin HC, Xirasagar S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan 09; 103(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 14704256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.
    Bailit JL, Garrett JM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb 09; 190(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 14981380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.
    Zollinger TW, Przybylski MJ, Gamache RE.
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan 09; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16039875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.
    Newton ER, Higgins CS.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Jun 09; 34(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 2738872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities.
    Main EK.
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan 09; 103(1 Suppl E):374-83. PubMed ID: 9917479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?
    Ruderman J, Carroll JC, Reid AJ, Murray MA.
    CMAJ; 1993 Feb 01; 148(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 8439912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE, Kruse LK, Jain NJ.
    Birth; 2006 Sep 01; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect.
    Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov 01; 191(5):1511-5. PubMed ID: 15547518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
    Bailit JL, Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep 01; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Active management of risk in pregnancy at term in an urban population: an association between a higher induction of labor rate and a lower cesarean delivery rate.
    Nicholson JM, Kellar LC, Cronholm PF, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov 01; 191(5):1516-28. PubMed ID: 15547519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.