These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR. Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Panel specifies who should decide to 'pull the plug. Med World News; 1982 Nov 22; 23(24):6-9. PubMed ID: 11645475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions. Nicholson EB, Horowitz RM, Parry J, American Bar Association. Commission on the Mentally Disabled, American Bar Association. National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986 Nov 22; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL. Indiana Law J; 1986 Nov 22; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent governmental action regarding the treatment of seriously ill newborns. Lawton SE, Carder EB, Weisman AW. J Coll Univ Law; 1985 Nov 22; 11(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 11651864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Baby Doe' may be undone. Caplan AL. N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb 09; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law? Burt RA. Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan 09; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ, Balch BJ. Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 09; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A law to save handicapped infants. Hentoff N. Washington Post; 1984 Oct 12; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting handicapped infants. Washington Post; 1984 Dec 04; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Suit emphasizes drawbacks of 'Baby Doe' rules. Am Med News; 1984 Dec 04; 27(12):4. PubMed ID: 11646355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule. Med World News; 1983 Jul 25; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ. Linacre Q; 1984 Aug 25; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G. South Univ Law Rev; 1983 Aug 25; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who should make medical decisions? Genel M. Conn Med; 1984 Aug 25; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]