These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 11688545

  • 1. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees.
    Wable J, Frachet B, Gallégo S.
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 11688545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB, Chambers And RD, Kraus N.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C, Cao K, Wang Z.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ, Connell SS, Hodges AV, Payne SL, Telischi FF, Eshraghi AA, Angeli SI, Germani R, Messiah S, Arheart KL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Dec; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A, Schüssler M, Battmer RD, Stöver T, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Dec; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.
    Wei CG, Cao K, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 15504607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.
    Wong AO, Wong LL.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun; 130(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 15195063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR, Shannon RV, Wilkinson EP, Hitselberger WE, McCreery DB, Moore JK, Brackmann DE.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.