These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
126 related items for PubMed ID: 11711354
1. Evaluation of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography for use in a brachytherapy program. Chenven ES, Glazier DB, Krisch EB, Diamond SM, Marmar JL. Urology; 2001 Nov; 58(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 11711354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy. MacMahon PJ, Kennedy AM, Murphy DT, Maher M, McNicholas MM. Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prostate and transition zone volume measured by the ellipsoid and planimetric methods with transrectal ultrasonography before seed implantation of prostate cancer. Ikeda T, Shinohara K. Int J Urol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 18269465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate? Nathan MS, Seenivasagam K, Mei Q, Wickham JE, Miller RA. Br J Urol; 1996 Mar; 77(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8814846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Transrectal ultrasonic volumetry of the prostate: in vivo comparison of different methods. Bangma CH, Niemer AQ, Grobbee DE, Schröder FH. Prostate; 1996 Feb; 28(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 8604390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conformal prostate brachytherapy: initial experience of a phase I/II dose-escalating trial. Martinez A, Gonzalez J, Stromberg J, Edmundson G, Plunkett M, Gustafson G, Brown D, Yan D, Vicini F, Brabbins D. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec 01; 33(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 7493828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of ellipsoid prostate deformation on dose delivery during permanent interstitial brachytherapy. Nakamura R, Ishiyama H, Tanji S, Satoh T, Oikawa H, Inatsu W, Ehara S, Hayakawa K. Brachytherapy; 2011 Dec 01; 10(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 20685175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American Brachytherapy Society. Nag S, Ciezki JP, Cormack R, Doggett S, DeWyngaert K, Edmundson GK, Stock RG, Stone NN, Yu Y, Zelefsky MJ, Clinical Research Committe, American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Dec 01; 51(5):1422-30. PubMed ID: 11728703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy. Prestidge BR, Bice WS, Kiefer EJ, Prete JJ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar 15; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Errors in transrectal ultrasonic planimetry of the prostate: computer simulation of volumetric errors applied to a screening population. Bangma CH, Hengeveld EJ, Niemer AQ, Schröder FH. Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995 Mar 15; 21(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7754570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry. Xue J, Waterman F, Handler J, Gressen E. Brachytherapy; 2006 Mar 15; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Applicability and dosimetric impact of ultrasound-based preplanning in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Aebersold DM, Isaak B, Thalmann G, Behrensmeier F, Kolotas C, Kranzbühler H, Mini R, Greiner RH. Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Jun 15; 180(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 15175869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. Terris MK, Stamey TA. J Urol; 1991 May 15; 145(5):984-7. PubMed ID: 2016815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups. Bienz M, Hueber PA, Al-Hathal N, McCormack M, Bhojani N, Trinh QD, Zorn KC. Urology; 2014 Jul 15; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI-based preplanning in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Tanaka O, Hayashi S, Matsuo M, Nakano M, Kubota Y, Maeda S, Ohtakara K, Deguchi T, Hoshi H. Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul 15; 88(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 17933407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. Rodriguez E, Skarecky D, Narula N, Ahlering TE. J Urol; 2008 Feb 15; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the Ellipsoid Formula the New Standard for 3-Tesla MRI Prostate Volume Calculation without Endorectal Coil? Haas M, Günzel K, Miller K, Hamm B, Cash H, Asbach P. Urol Int; 2017 Feb 15; 98(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 27627060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS. Kälkner KM, Kubicek G, Nilsson J, Lundell M, Levitt S, Nilsson S. Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov 15; 81(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17069912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of three calliper-based transrectal ultrasound methods and digital rectal examination in the estimation of prostate volume and its changes with age: the Krimpen study. Bosch JL, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FP, Bernsen R. Prostate; 2005 Mar 01; 62(4):353-63. PubMed ID: 15389783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy. Jeong CW, Park HK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee HJ, Lee SE. Urol Int; 2008 Mar 01; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]