These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

285 related items for PubMed ID: 11752966

  • 1. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, Kim SJ.
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
    Han JK, Kim AY, Lee KY, Seo JB, Kim TK, Choi BI, Lhee CS, Han MC.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
    Li J, Udayasankar UK, Tang X, Carew J, Toth TL, Small WC.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Feb; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hepatic CT enhancement: effect of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model.
    Garcia P, Genin G, Bret PM, Bonaldi VM, Reinhold C, Atri M.
    Abdom Imaging; 1999 Feb; 24(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 10525816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Forman HP, DiCroce J.
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement.
    Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Miyoshi T, Shiratori Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 17312064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optimal arterial phase imaging for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma determined by continuous image capture on 16-MDCT.
    Ma X, Samir AE, Holalkere NS, Sahani DV.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):772-7. PubMed ID: 18716108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M, Sugimoto K, Fujii M, Sugimura K.
    Radiat Med; 2004 Sep; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multiphase multislice spiral CT for liver assessment: optimization in cirrhotic patients.
    Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Carbone I, Ferrari R, Mangiapane F, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2002 Mar; 103(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11976615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver by means of helical CT: comparison of different contrast medium concentrations within the same patient.
    Sultana S, Morishita S, Awai K, Kawanaka K, Ohyama Y, Nakayama Y, Imuta M, Arakawa A, Yamashita Y.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Mar; 21(6):239-45. PubMed ID: 14743896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part I. Prediction with a computer model.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA.
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 9609886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. CT of the abdomen: degree and quality of enhancement obtained with two concentrations of the same iodinated contrast medium with fixed iodine delivery rate and total iodine load.
    Paparo F, Garello I, Bacigalupo L, Marziano A, Galletto Pregliasco A, Rollandi L, Puppo C, Mattioli F, Puntoni M, Rollandi GA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 25174776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.
    Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T, Koike S, Shimizu A, Matsunaga N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 15208131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
    Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, Watanabe M, Sano T, Nin S, Koike R, Nishimura Y, Yamashita Y.
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.