These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Enhanced mutation and neoplastic transformation in human cells by 29 kVp relative to 200 kVp X rays indicating a strong dependence of RBE on photon energy. Frankenberg D, Kelnhofer K, Garg I, Bär K, Frankenberg-Schwager M. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12194301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mutation induction and neoplastic transformation in human and human-hamster hybrid cells: dependence on photon energy and modulation in the low-dose range. Frankenberg D, Frankenberg-Schwager M, Garg I, Pralle E, Uthe D, Greve B, Severin E, Göhde W. J Radiol Prot; 2002 Sep; 22(3A):A17-20. PubMed ID: 12400941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells. Göggelmann W, Jacobsen C, Panzer W, Walsh L, Roos H, Schmid E. Radiat Environ Biophys; 2003 Oct; 42(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 14551783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The RBE of 3.4 MeV alpha-particles and 0.565 MeV neutrons relative to 60Co gamma-rays for neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells and the impact of culture conditions. Frankenberg-Schwager M, Spieren S, Pralle E, Giesen U, Brede HJ, Thiemig M, Frankenberg D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jan; 138(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19828717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The neoplastic transformation potential of mammography X rays and atomic bomb spectrum radiation. Heyes GJ, Mill AJ. Radiat Res; 2004 Aug; 162(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 15387138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Electron spectra and the RBE of X rays. Kellerer AM. Radiat Res; 2002 Jul; 158(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12071799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there reliable experimental evidence for a low-dose RBE of about 4 for mammography X rays relative to 200 kV X rays? Schmid E. Radiat Res; 2002 Dec; 158(6):778-81. PubMed ID: 12452781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mutagenicity of low-filtered 30 kVp X-rays, mammography X-rays and conventional X-rays in cultured mammalian cells. Frankenberg-Schwager M, Garg I, Fran-Kenberg D, Greve B, Severin E, Uthe D, Göhde W. Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Sep; 78(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 12428919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. Heyes GJ, Mill AJ, Charles MW. Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):195-200. PubMed ID: 16498030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose-effect relationships, epidemiological analysis and the derivation of low dose risk. Leenhouts HP, Chadwick KH. J Radiol Prot; 2011 Mar; 31(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 21346287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose protraction studies with low- and high-LET radiations on neoplastic cell transformation in vitro. Yang TC-H, Craise LM, Mei M-T, Tobias CA. Adv Space Res; 1986 Mar; 6(11):137-47. PubMed ID: 11537213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. X rays may be twice as potent as gamma rays for malignant transformation at low doses. Borek C, Hall EJ, Zaider M. Nature; 1983 Jan 13; 301(5896):156-8. PubMed ID: 6823292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]