These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 11757241

  • 1. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].
    Giard RW, Bonneux LG.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov 17; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs.
    Greif JM.
    Breast; 2010 Aug 17; 19(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 20371181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [The benefit of population screening for breast cancer; an advisory report from the Health Council of the Netherlands].
    van Veen WA, Knottnerus JA.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jun 01; 146(22):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12073502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep 17; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mammography screening under 50: a limited perspective on a multifaceted issue.
    Royak-Schaler R, Gallant SJ, Klabunde CN.
    Womens Health; 1996 Sep 17; 2(4):243-9; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9421559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk assessment, screening and prevention of breast cancer: A look at cost-effectiveness.
    Lebovic GS, Hollingsworth A, Feig SA.
    Breast; 2010 Aug 17; 19(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 20399656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV, Jones S, Nehill C, Favelle S, Steel D, Iverson D, Zorbas H.
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan 14; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR, Autier P.
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep 14; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
    Humphrey LL, Ballard DJ.
    Prim Care; 1989 Mar 14; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
    van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar 04; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?
    Baker S, Wall M, Bloomfield A.
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug 26; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.
    Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening.
    J Med Screen; 2006 Aug 26; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 16792825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Breast cancer screening, outside the population-screening program, of women from breast cancer families without proven BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: a simulation study.
    Jacobi CE, Nagelkerke NJ, van Houwelingen JH, de Bock GH.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Mar 26; 15(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 16537697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U.
    Rofo; 2006 Oct 26; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
    Lee CH, Weinreb JC.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar 26; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women].
    Mühlhauser I, Höldke B.
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct 26; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004 Oct 26; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Clinical and mammographic screening in a district of Milan: organization, social influence and results].
    Pravettoni A, Cescon S, Moro G, Verga M, Saibene F, Micheli A.
    Epidemiol Prev; 1993 Dec 26; 17(57):296-301. PubMed ID: 7957707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US.
    Das B, Feuer EJ, Mariotto A.
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug 26; 16(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 16049808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H, Bordás P, Wallin H, Nyström L, Lenner P.
    J Med Screen; 2007 Aug 26; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.