These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

99 related items for PubMed ID: 11759980

  • 1. A comparison between 50 mcg oral misoprostol every 4 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Pongsatha S, Tongsong T, Somsak T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jul; 84(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 11759980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R, Getgan M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S, Sahin GH, Sahin HA.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F, Zwizwai M, Nyström L, Lindmark G.
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002 Dec; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W, Dudenhausen JW, Hanel C, Chen FC.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L, Peden H, Tomlinson AJ, Al-Hussaini TK, Idama T, Candelier C, Luckas M, Furniss H, Davies A, Kumar B, Roberts J, Alfirevic Z.
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Windrim R, Bennett K, Mundle W, Young DC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 9052592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM, Sirichand P, Rizvi S.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Srisomboon J, Singchai S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Oct; 81(10):779-83. PubMed ID: 9803069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Fisher SA, Mackenzie VP, Davies GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ.
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Guberman C, Tran S, Parrish A, Guinn D.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The routine use of oxytocin after oral misoprostol for labour induction in women with an unfavourable cervix is not of benefit.
    De A, Bagga R, Gopalan S.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 46(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 16866794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.