These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

386 related items for PubMed ID: 11767190

  • 21. Differences in Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft aortic valve hemodynamics. Effect of valve size.
    Khan SS, Mitchell RS, Derby GC, Oyer PE, Miller DC.
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV117-24. PubMed ID: 2225396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ, Eichinger WB, Hettich IM, Bleiziffer S, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Trilogy pericardial valve: hemodynamic performance and calcification in adolescent sheep.
    Flameng W, Meuris B, De Visscher G, Cunanan C, Lane E, Verbeken E, Herijgers P, Herregods MC.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):587-92. PubMed ID: 18222270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN, Jaussaud N, Matthews PB, Chuter TA, Ge L, Guy TS, Guccione J, Tseng EE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The influence of sizing and method of fixation on the hydrodynamic function of stentless, free-hand inserted porcine bioprosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Revanna P, Fisher J, Watterson KG.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 9263877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients.
    Bach DS, Schmitz C, Dohmen G, Aaronson KD, Steinseifer U, Kleine P.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
    Totaro P, Degno N, Zaidi A, Youhana A, Argano V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
    Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Canver CC, Sallehuddin A, Al-Oufi S, Joufan M, Al-Halees Z.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Keithahn A, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.
    Gabbay S, McQueen DM, Yellin EL, Becker RM, Frater RW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 713584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Hydrodynamic performance of Carbomedics valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M, Campbell A, Richard G, Borst HG, Laas J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 8000611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
    Chambers JB, Wang Z, Cooke RA, Black MM.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Improved statistical characterization of prosthetic heart valve hydrodynamics using a performance index and regression analysis.
    Stewart SF, Bushar HF.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 12000171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The in vitro function of 19-mm bioprosthetic heart valves in the aortic position.
    Scotten LN, Walker DK, Brownlee RT.
    Life Support Syst; 1987 Mar; 5(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 3669721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F, Dzemali O, Steinseiffer U, Schmitz C, Glasmacher B, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Clinical problems of biological and mechanical valves--comparative study of mitral valve replacement with a biological valve and aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve].
    Komatsu S, Tanaka N.
    Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1981 Nov; 1(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 7052583
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions.
    Daebritz SH, Fausten B, Hermanns B, Franke A, Schroeder J, Groetzner J, Autschbach R, Messmer BJ, Sachweh JS.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2004 Nov; 7(5):E525-32. PubMed ID: 15799940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of small-size Sorin Slimline and St. Jude HP heart valve prostheses.
    Otero E, Pomar JL, Revuelta JM, Rufilanchas JJ.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1284-90. PubMed ID: 15797063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A single-center experience of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: long-term clinical, hematological and hemodynamic results.
    Whitaker DC, James SE, Walesby RK.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jan; 13(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 14765847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.