These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

908 related items for PubMed ID: 11769829

  • 1. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.
    Ergin S, Gemalmaz D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Nov; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R, Rappelli G, Camaioni E, Cattani M, Meyer JM, Belser UC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P, Pujari M, Prithviraj DR, Khare S.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Woelfel JB.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Nov; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Nov; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Nov; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR, Ribeiro RF, Antunes RP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
    Sadig WM, Al Harbi MW.
    Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.