These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

823 related items for PubMed ID: 11783873

  • 41. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E, Saunders RD, van Deventer ET, Repacholi MH.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. [Occupational exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields in workers employed in various jobs].
    Gobba F, Roccatto L, Vandelli AM, Besutti G, Ghersi R, Nicolini O.
    Med Lav; 2004 Jun; 95(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 15732257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G, Perduri R, Murolo A.
    Med Lav; 2008 Jun; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Human exposure to electric and magnetic fields from RF sealers and dielectric heaters--a COMAR technical information statement.
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999 Jun; 18(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 9934609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults.
    Bracken TD, Rankin RF, Senior RS, Kavet R, Geissinger LG.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Mar; 16(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 11297051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. A quick and easy method for checking compliance of multi-frequency magnetic fields with ICNIRP's guidelines.
    Filippopoulos G, Karabetsos E.
    Health Phys; 2008 Aug; 95(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 18617807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. [Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and its health effects in electric energy workers].
    Szadkowska-Stańczyk I, Zmyślony M.
    Med Pr; 2000 Aug; 51(6):637-52. PubMed ID: 11288692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR, Martin LJ.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Computational dosimetry of induced electric fields during realistic movements in the vicinity of a 3 T MRI scanner.
    Laakso I, Kännälä S, Jokela K.
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr 21; 58(8):2625-40. PubMed ID: 23552657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Occupational exposures to high frequency electromagnetic fields in the intermediate range ( >300 Hz-10 MHz).
    Floderus B, Stenlund C, Carlgren F.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Dec 21; 23(8):568-77. PubMed ID: 12395411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Current density in a model of a human body with a conductive implant exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields.
    Valic B, Gajsek P, Miklavcic D.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct 21; 30(7):591-9. PubMed ID: 19418511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. [Hygienic assessment of sources of electromagnetic fields using revised and new standards of maximum admissible intensities].
    Aniołczyk H, Mamrot P, Politański P.
    Med Pr; 2004 Oct 21; 55(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15156768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Comparison of electric fields induced in humans and rodents by 60-Hz contact currents.
    Dawson TW, Caputa K, Stuchly MA, Kavet R.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun 21; 50(6):744-53. PubMed ID: 12814241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Current densities in a pregnant woman model induced by simultaneous ELF electric and magnetic field exposure.
    Cech R, Leitgeb N, Pediaditis M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan 07; 53(1):177-86. PubMed ID: 18182695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Assessment of occupational exposure patterns by frequency-domain analysis of time series data.
    Mihlan GJ, Todd LA, Truong KN.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jan 07; 15(1):120-30. PubMed ID: 10712067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Electric emissions from electrical appliances.
    Leitgeb N, Cech R, Schröttner J.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Jan 07; 129(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18083998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A.
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun 07; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Assessing compliance with power-frequency magnetic-field guidelines.
    Bracken TD.
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep 07; 83(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 12199555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.