These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

321 related items for PubMed ID: 11784764

  • 1. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA, Nye AD.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jan; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF, Tremblay KL.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Mar; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholds.
    Miller AL, Arenberg JG, Middlebrooks JC, Pfingst BE.
    Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):55-66. PubMed ID: 11223281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE, Xu L.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis.
    Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blamey PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2658-69. PubMed ID: 8207139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA, Woodruff KE, Pfingst BE.
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants.
    George SS, Shivdasani MN, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB.
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066005. PubMed ID: 26401834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.