These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

321 related items for PubMed ID: 11784764

  • 21. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Auditory cortical images of tones and noise bands.
    Arenberg JG, Furukawa S, Middlebrooks JC.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 1(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 11545145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.
    Lim HH, Anderson DJ.
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 96(3):975-88. PubMed ID: 16723413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation.
    Phillips DP, Orman SS.
    J Neurophysiol; 1984 Jan; 51(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 6693932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Accessing ampli-tonotopic organization of rat auditory cortex by microstimulation of cochlear nucleus.
    Takahashi H, Nakao M, Kaga K.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1333-44. PubMed ID: 16041997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE, Zwolan TA, Holloway LA.
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):247-60. PubMed ID: 9367245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation.
    Raggio MW, Schreiner CE.
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):3190-204. PubMed ID: 12783954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats.
    Popelár J, Hartmann R, Syka J, Klinke R.
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [An experimental study of the auditory brainstem implant in guinea pigs].
    Cao K, Shi X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Hu K.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1994 Dec; 16(6):416-9. PubMed ID: 7720137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
    Rebscher SJ, Hetherington AM, Snyder RL, Leake PA, Bonham BH.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct 15; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000 Oct 15; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
    Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE.
    Hear Res; 2022 Feb 15; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
    DeVries L, Scheperle R, Bierer JA.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun 15; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Pfingst BE, Franck KH, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TA.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun 15; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM, Remine MD, McDermott HJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep 15; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness.
    Raggio MW, Schreiner CE.
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec 15; 82(6):3506-26. PubMed ID: 10601478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the cochlear limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Clark GM.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug 15; 21(4):291-304. PubMed ID: 10981605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evidence of a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users.
    Guiraud J, Besle J, Arnold L, Boyle P, Giard MH, Bertrand O, Norena A, Truy E, Collet L.
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jul 18; 27(29):7838-46. PubMed ID: 17634377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.