These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

135 related items for PubMed ID: 11786826

  • 1. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part I. Refining practices by using motion and time study principles.
    Tebbetts JB.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):273-90; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 11786826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation.
    Tebbetts JB.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):293-305; discussion 306-7. PubMed ID: 11786828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes.
    Tebbetts JB.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Dec; 118(7 Suppl):53S-80S. PubMed ID: 17099484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases.
    Khan UD.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):290-302. PubMed ID: 23354762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
    Kolker AR, Austen WG, Slavin SA.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L, Eder M, Zimmermann A, Müller D, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E, Klöppel M, Machens HG.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC, Landecker A.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003 Aug; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD, Largent J, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Brown MH.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
    Khan UD.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An analysis of anesthesia-controlled operating room time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery: a retrospective study.
    Wu ZF, Jian GS, Lee MS, Lin C, Chen YF, Chen YW, Huang YS, Cherng CH, Lu CH.
    Anesth Analg; 2014 Dec; 119(6):1393-406. PubMed ID: 25211391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of parity in primary breast augmentation: A clinical and cost-effective case control study.
    Montemurro P, Pafitanis G, Asokan H, Hedén P.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Jul; 75(7):2337-2342. PubMed ID: 35317979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types.
    Tebbetts JB.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr 15; 107(5):1255-72. PubMed ID: 11373572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes.
    Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz JC.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug 15; 112(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 12900603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004 Aug 15; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The process of breast augmentation: four sequential steps for optimizing outcomes for patients.
    Adams WP.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Dec 15; 122(6):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 19050543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
    Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, Nunes D, Vargas AF.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007 Dec 15; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.