These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

188 related items for PubMed ID: 11803223

  • 1. Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Has R, Batukan C, Ermis H, Cevher E, Araman A, Kiliç G, Ibrahimoğlu L.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 11803223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E, Guerra-Velásquez M, Torres-Montilla M, Reyna-Villasmil N, Mejia-Montilla J, Labarca-Vincero N.
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
    Sharami SH, Milani F, Faraji R, Bloukimoghadam K, Salamat F, Momenzadeh S, Ebrahimi H.
    Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
    Meydanli MM, Calişkan E, Burak F, Narin MA, Atmaca R.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG, Tedesco RP, Pires HM, Calderon IM, Faúndes A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006 Mar; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Diro M, Adra A, Gilles JM, Nassar A, Rodriguez A, Salamat SM, Beydoun SN, O'Sullivan MJ, Yasin SY, Burkett G.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999 Oct; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM.
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.