These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 11803387

  • 1. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
    Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A, Pai KM.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H, Moses O.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999 Feb; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery.
    Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987 Feb; 2(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 3481354
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
    Frei C, Buser D, Dula K.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996 Aug; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME, Richardson AC.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P, Biçer I.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
    Peltola JS, Mattila M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validation of spiral computed tomography for dental implants.
    Cavalcanti MG, Yang J, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):329-33. PubMed ID: 10895630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
    Casselman JW, Deryckere F, Hermans R, Declercq C, Neyt L, Pattyn G, Meeus L, Vandevoorde P, Steyaert L, Devos V.
    Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L, Saulacic N, Belser U, Bernard JP.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Localisation of the mandibular canal using conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 11359480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs.
    Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Jun; 6(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7578787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
    Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC.
    J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Three-dimensional computer tomography (CT) in the evaluation of placement for dental implants.
    Lee CY.
    Hawaii Dent J; 1996 Dec; 27(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 11908285
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
    Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Russell CM, Sharawy M.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.