These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 11808622

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP.
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G.
    Women Polit; 1991 Oct; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
    Robertson JA.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992 Oct; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J.
    Const Law J; 1993 Oct; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993 Oct; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A.
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J.
    Womens Health Issues; 1993 Mar; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion law today.
    Field MA.
    J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW.
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
    Colker R.
    Tex J Women Law; 1994 Mar; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul 23; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA.
    Hum Life Rev; 2003 Jul 23; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992 Jul 23; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov 30; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989 Nov 30; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD.
    Houst Law Rev; 2002 Nov 30; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.