These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 11809545

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
    Schäfer FK, Schäfer PJ, Jahnke T, Walluscheck K, Priebe M, Hentsch A, Heller M, Brossmann J.
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW, Thalhammer C, Jacob AL, Jaeger K, Bilecen D.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M, Tefera G, Thornton F, Siepman D, Turnipseed W.
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: role of MR angiography.
    Gozzi M, Amorico MG, Colopi S, Favali M, Gallo E, Torricelli P, Polverini I, Gargiulo M.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Mar; 111(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 16671380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, Hellmich M, Nijenhuis M, Lackner K, Gossmann A.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography.
    Winchester PA, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, Wang Y, Trost DW, Bush HL, Sos TA.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998 Sep; 9(6):891-9; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 9840032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A, Sheng R, Omniscan MRA Investigator Panel.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.
    Schaefer PJ, Schaefer FK, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Both M, Heller M, Jahnke T.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007 Jun; 30(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 17278036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.