These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

344 related items for PubMed ID: 11812471

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.
    Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D.
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 8872262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cancellous bone screw thread design and holding power.
    Asnis SE, Ernberg JJ, Bostrom MP, Wright TM, Harrington RM, Tencer A, Peterson M.
    J Orthop Trauma; 1996 Aug; 10(7):462-9. PubMed ID: 8892145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screws in normal and osteoporotic bone material.
    Battula S, Schoenfeld A, Vrabec G, Njus GO.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 16500737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Experimental study of improved threading of bone screws].
    Ungethüm M, Blömer W, Reichle V.
    Aktuelle Traumatol; 1983 Jun; 13(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 6136166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
    DiPaola CP, Jacobson JA, Awad H, Conrad BP, Rechtine GR.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparative biomechanical studies of conventional and self-tapping cortical bone screws].
    Hess T, Hopf T, Fritsch E, Mittelmeier H.
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1991 Jul; 129(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 1833915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Ricci WM, Tornetta P, Petteys T, Gerlach D, Cartner J, Walker Z, Russell TA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the holding power of 3.5-mm cortical versus 4.0-mm cancellous orthopedic screws in the pelvis of immature dogs (cadavers).
    Sardinas JC, Kraus KH, Sisson RD.
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Feb; 56(2):248-51. PubMed ID: 7717594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the loosening characteristics of self-tapped and non-self-tapped cortical bone screws.
    Vangsness CT, Carter DR, Frankel VH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981 Jun; (157):279-86. PubMed ID: 7249457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.