These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

316 related items for PubMed ID: 11817797

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J, Möller K, Koch G.
    Swed Dent J; 1992 Jul; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored restorations in proximal lesions of primary molars.
    Toh SL, Messer LB.
    Pediatr Dent; 2007 Jul; 29(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18041507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D, Peric T.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW, Richardson AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML, Tylka JA, Sandrik J.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M, Mulki E, Roldan R, Arevalo O, Roberts JF, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016 Jun; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP, Rosenblatt A, Medeiros E.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006 Jun; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.