These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

102 related items for PubMed ID: 11818625

  • 1. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.
    Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Ernster VL, Yankaskas BC, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Dignan MB, Rosenberg RD, Urban N, Zheng Y, Taplin SH.
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 11818625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Carney PA, Geller BM, Urban N, Dignan MB, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):529-35. PubMed ID: 11818624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C, Holt S, Peacock S, White E, Urban N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice.
    Lee AY, Ichikawa L, Lee JM, Lee CI, DeMartini WB, Joe BN, Wernli KJ, Sprague BL, Herschorn SD, Lehman CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 26700354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Management of probably benign breast lesions.
    Sickles EA.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1123-30. PubMed ID: 7480660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluating hormone therapy-associated increases in breast density comparison between reported and simultaneous assignment of BI-RADS categories, visual assessment, and quantitative analysis.
    Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE, Smolkin ME, Williams MB, Petroni GR.
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 16039539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
    Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G, Topal U.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Follow-up frequency and compliance in women with probably benign findings on breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Marshall AL, Domchek SM, Weinstein SP.
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 22227041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
    Raghu M, Durand MA, Andrejeva L, Goehler A, Michalski MH, Geisel JL, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Butler R, Forman HP, Philpotts LE.
    Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].
    Hauth EA, Khan K, Wolfgarten B, Betzler A, Kimmig R, Forsting M.
    Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 17265008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BI-RADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49-year-old women.
    McKay C, Hart CL, Erbacher G.
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Oct; 100(10):615-20. PubMed ID: 11105450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS.
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions.
    Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Saini MH, Peacock S, Lehman CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 19696303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties.
    Stines J.
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 17178447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of rate of development and rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed.
    Giess CS, Keating DM, Osborne MP, Mester J, Rosenblatt R.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 10954468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.
    Ball CG, Butchart M, MacFarlane JK.
    Can J Surg; 2002 Aug; 45(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 12174979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.