These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

637 related items for PubMed ID: 11843452

  • 1. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Mar; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005 Mar; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Mar; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Mar; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A, Ortorp A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 May; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 May; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I, Marton S, Hegedüs C.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 May; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 May; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Aug; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Aug; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C.
    Braz Dent J; 2000 Aug; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.