These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

379 related items for PubMed ID: 11844202

  • 21. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F, Ramalho C, Machado AP, Calado E, Cardoso F, Montenegro N.
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound Parameters and Bishop Score as Predictors of Successful Induction of Labor in Term High-Risk Pregnancy.
    Shakya S, Shrestha A.
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2024; 22(86):202-209. PubMed ID: 39328112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.
    Tanir HM, Sener T, Yildiz Z.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
    Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
    Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Pérez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, Izquierdo F, Bajo J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study].
    Ancel J, Huissoud C.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
    Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, Rodrigues G, Carmo OD.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of cervical volume to predict the outcome of the induction of labour: a prospective observational study.
    Athulathmudali SR, Patabendige M, Chandrasinghe SK, De Silva PHP.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jun 22; 21(1):433. PubMed ID: 34158010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
    Gillor M, Vaisbuch E, Zaks S, Barak O, Hagay Z, Levy R.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb 22; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.