These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

414 related items for PubMed ID: 11844203

  • 1. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Otigbah CM, Howard RJ, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S, Mitra SN, Banerjee PK, Biswas PK, Bhattacharyya S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Parul.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X, Yang A, Ma Q, Li X, Qin L, He T.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A, Lv J, Hu Y, Lang J, Ma L, Chen W.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A, Senat MV, Ehlinger V, Gallini A, Morin M, Olivier P, Roth E, Orusco E, Javoise S, Fort J, Lavergne C, Arnaud C, Rozenberg P, Vayssiere C, Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique rt Gynécologie.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.