These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 11846509

  • 1. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat.
    Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, Danias J.
    Exp Eye Res; 2001 Dec; 73(6):781-5. PubMed ID: 11846509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
    Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, Chen B, Danias J.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
    Morris CA, Crowston JG, Lindsey JD, Danias J, Weinreb RN.
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices.
    Filippopoulos T, Matsubara A, Danias J, Huang W, Dobberfuhl A, Ren L, Mittag T, Miller JW, Grosskreutz CL.
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 16564045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice.
    Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1138-41. PubMed ID: 12601041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
    Wang WH, Millar JC, Pang IH, Wax MB, Clark AF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
    Kim CY, Kuehn MH, Anderson MG, Kwon YH.
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Manometric calibration and comparison of TonoLab and TonoPen tonometers in rats with experimental glaucoma and in normal mice.
    Pease ME, Hammond JC, Quigley HA.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Dec; 15(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 17106364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P, Díaz-Rey JA, Queirós A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW, Yevelenko V, Hoy L, Meyer A, Erb C.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice.
    Alvarez TL, Gollance SA, Thomas GA, Greene RJ, Marchetto PM, Moore EJ, Realini T, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Lama P, Fechtner RD.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Noninvasive measurement of rat intraocular pressure with the Tono-Pen.
    Moore CG, Milne ST, Morrison JC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Feb; 34(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 8440590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
    Naruse S, Mori K, Kinoshita S.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
    Deuter CM, Schlote T, Hahn GA, Bende T, Derse M.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry.
    Queirós A, González-Méijome JM, Fernandes P, Jorge J, Montés-Micó R, Almeida JB, Parafita MA.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 17718891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
    Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Viestenz A.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
    Leiva M, Naranjo C, Peña MT.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
    Andrade SF, Cremonezi T, Zachi CA, Lonchiati CF, Amatuzzi JD, Sakamoto KP, Mello PA.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.