These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 11848619

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of urine sediment using newly designed centrifuge tubes.
    Kim Y, Jin DC, Lee EJ, Lee DH, Chung HH, Kim M, Lim J, Lee A, Lee KY, Kang CS, Han K, Pai SH.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 32(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11848619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study.
    Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Köchli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, Huber AR.
    Clin Nephrol; 2001 May; 55(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 11393384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.
    Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85 Suppl 1():S246-52. PubMed ID: 12188419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Clinical significance of urinary sediment dysmorphic red blood cells and casts in renal disease].
    Imai N, Orita Y, Tanaka Y, Konobe K, Amino N, Miyai K.
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jul; 40(7):720-7. PubMed ID: 1507490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy.
    Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, Hoffer P, Temporin V, Valverde S, Gessoni G.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 48(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 20482296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.
    Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, Lin PC, Hong JS, Hsieh HP, Chien MJ.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Inaccuracy and inefficiency of urinary sediment analysis.
    Yoo YM, Tatsumi N, Kirihigashi K, Narita M, Tsuda I, Kawamoto T, Takubo T.
    Osaka City Med J; 1995 Dec; 41(2):41-8. PubMed ID: 8778645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Urinary sediment features in proliferative and non-proliferative glomerular diseases.
    Fogazzi GB, Saglimbeni L, Banfi G, Cantú M, Moroni G, Garigali G, Cesana BM.
    J Nephrol; 2005 Dec; 18(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 16358228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of three methods for analysis of urinary sediments.
    Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Koezuka T, Okamura M, Yamagami S.
    Osaka City Med J; 1996 Dec; 42(2):77-92. PubMed ID: 9046847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Evaluation of the performances of the UF-1000i(®) automated urine analyzer].
    Fabbro C, Darolles J, Rault JP.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2011 Dec; 69(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 21896408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination.
    Xiang D, Cong Y, Wang C, Yue J, Ma X, Lu Y, Liu P, Ma J.
    Clin Lab; 2012 Dec; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Urinary sediment analyzed by flow cytometry.
    Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Park K, Koezuka T.
    Cytometry; 1995 Mar 15; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 7587738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug 15; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinically relevant differences in prothrombin time and INR values related to blood sample collection in plastic vs glass tubes.
    Fiebig EW, Etzell JE, Ng VL.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec 15; 124(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 16416740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Utility of urinalysis in discriminating cardioembolic stroke mechanism.
    Viehman JA, Saver JL, Liebeskind DS, Starkman S, Ali LK, Buck B, Razinia T, Ovbiagele B.
    Arch Neurol; 2007 May 15; 64(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 17502465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Predicting urine culture results by dipstick testing and phase contrast microscopy.
    Smith P, Morris A, Reller LB.
    Pathology; 2003 Apr 15; 35(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12745465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Preanalytics of urine sediment examination: effect of relative centrifugal force, tube type, volume of sample and supernatant removal.
    Bunjevac A, Gabaj NN, Miler M, Horvat A.
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Feb 15; 28(1):010707. PubMed ID: 29472802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative analysis of two methodologies for the identification of urinary red blood cell casts.
    Ito CA, Pecoits-Filho R, Bail L, Wosiack MA, Afinovicz D, Hauser AB.
    J Bras Nefrol; 2011 Dec 15; 33(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 22189802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.