These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 1185123

  • 1. Hemisphere differences in the effects of cuing in visual recognition tasks.
    Cohen C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 1185123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D.
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing].
    Hildebrandt H, Fresenborg I, Engel A.
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition.
    Nicholls ME, Wood AG.
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cerebral asymmetries in inspection time?
    Sadler AJ, Deary IJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 1996 Apr; 34(4):283-95. PubMed ID: 8657359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A test of Kinsbourne's selective activation model.
    Demakis GJ, Harrison DW, Campen M.
    Int J Neurosci; 1993 Oct; 72(3-4):201-7. PubMed ID: 8138375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Orienting attention within visual fields: how efficient is interhemispheric transfer?
    Hardyck C, Chiarello C, Dronkers NF, Simpson GV.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Oct; 11(5):650-66. PubMed ID: 2932534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sex and visual field effects on accuracy and decision making when subjects classify male and female faces.
    Jones B.
    Cortex; 1979 Dec; 15(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 548219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series.
    Verleger R, Śmigasiewicz K.
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():260-73. PubMed ID: 25777355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetries in the recognition of animal photographs in different views.
    de-Mattos-Pimenta MA, Tiedemann KB.
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 1990 Sep; 23(11):1201-4. PubMed ID: 2133032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cuing efficiency in a Stroop-like task with visual half-field presentation.
    Eglin M, Hunter A.
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 2233259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The hemispheric lateralization of the recognition of noisy visual stimuli in man].
    Udalova GP.
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1990 Sep; 40(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 2169147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.