These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 1185123

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. [Hemispheric participation in the shaping of spatial-motor asymmetry in visual recognition in rats].
    Udalova GP, Mikheev VV.
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1988; 38(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 3188642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.
    Bruyer R.
    Hum Neurobiol; 1986; 5(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 3733477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. [Cerebral functional asymmetry in face perception by the patients with focal brain damage].
    Fersten E, Szelag E, Luczywek E, Szumska J.
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 1991; 25(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 1803257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Changes in hemispheric advantage in processing facial information with increasing stimulus familiarization.
    Ross P, Turkewitz G.
    Cortex; 1982 Dec; 18(4):489-99. PubMed ID: 7166037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?
    Nakamura K, Oga T, Takahashi M, Kuribayashi T, Kanamori Y, Matsumiya T, Maeno Y, Yamamoto M.
    Cortex; 2012 Apr; 48(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 21292251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Deployment of spatial attention to words in central and peripheral vision.
    Ducrot S, Grainger J.
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 May; 69(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 17727111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Visual field differences in the processing of numerical stimuli.
    Klein R, McInnes J.
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Jun; 7(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 3401381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Two types of image generation: evidence for left and right hemisphere processes.
    Kosslyn SM, Maljkovic V, Hamilton SE, Horwitz G, Thompson WL.
    Neuropsychologia; 1995 Nov; 33(11):1485-510. PubMed ID: 8584182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect.
    Shimozaki S, Kingstone A, Olk B, Stowe R, Eckstein M.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 29; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.