These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

619 related items for PubMed ID: 11863352

  • 1. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
    Höijer CJ, Brandt J, Willenheimer R, Juul-Möller S, Boström PA.
    Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: a double-blind, randomized crossover study.
    Höijer CJ, Meurling C, Brandt J.
    Europace; 2006 Jan; 8(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16627409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E, Perucca A, Fazzari M, Pistis G, Baduini G, Trevi G.
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
    Epperlein S, Kreft A, Siegert V, Liebrich A, Himmrich E, Treese N.
    Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
    Moro E, Caprioglio F, Berton G, Marcon C, Riva U, Corbucci G, Delise P.
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. DDDR pacing results in left ventricular asynchrony with preservation of ejection fraction and NT-proBNP: a prospective study in sick sinus syndrome and normal ventricular function.
    Psychari SN, Apostolou TS, Iliodromitis EK, Charalampopoulos A, Kremastinos DT.
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct 08; 144(2):310-2. PubMed ID: 19342110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL.
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov 08; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, MOde Selection Trial Investigators.
    Circulation; 2003 Jun 17; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.
    Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Sgarbossa EB, Huang SK, Marinchak RA, Estes NA, Mitchell GF, Lieberman EH, Mangione CM, Goldman L.
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr 16; 338(16):1097-104. PubMed ID: 9545357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
    Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, Sowton E.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar 01; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE).
    Kindermann M, Hennen B, Jung J, Geisel J, Böhm M, Fröhlig G.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May 16; 47(10):1927-37. PubMed ID: 16697307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
    Wilkoff BL, Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator trial investigators.
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec 16; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
    Veasey RA, Arya A, Silberbauer J, Sharma V, Lloyd GW, Patel NR, Sulke AN.
    Europace; 2011 Jun 16; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients.
    Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M, Leon A, Yee R, Ellenbogen K, Greer S, Wilber D, Silverman R, Marinchak R, Bernstein R, Mittleman RS, Lieberman EH, Sullivan C, Zorn L, Flaker G, Schron E, Orav EJ, Goldman L.
    Am Heart J; 2000 Oct 16; 140(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 11011325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.