These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 11867588

  • 1. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation.
    Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 11818373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA, Samuels SJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1903-8. PubMed ID: 14522761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Apr; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T, Lai MQ, Barber L.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JP, Costa VP.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
    Haymes SA, Hutchison DM, McCormick TA, Varma DK, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Frequency doubling perimetry in terminal visual field defects].
    Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, González Martín-Moro J, Cerio-Ramsden CD.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2003 Apr; 78(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 12743844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry.
    Horn FK, Brenning A, Jünemann AG, Lausen B.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Feb; 16(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 17570999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.