These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 11872873

  • 1. Comparing cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in systematic and opportunistic approaches.
    Postma MJ, Welte R, van den Hoek JA, Morré SA.
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb; 78(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 11872873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
    Ruitenberg EN.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 May 08; 143(19):1012. PubMed ID: 10368724
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Gupta M, Hernon M, Gokhale R, Ghosh AK.
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb 08; 78(1):76. PubMed ID: 11872877
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Major improvements in cost effectiveness of screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis using pooled urine specimens and high performance testing.
    Morré SA, Welte R, Postma MJ.
    Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Feb 08; 78(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 11872874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ, Welte R, van den Hoek JA, Jager JC, van Doornum GJ, Coutinho RA.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov 20; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Should all sexually active young women in Hungary be screened for Chlamydia trachomatis?
    Nyári T, Woodward M, Kovács L.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jan 10; 106(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12475582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Summaries for patients. The cost-effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia in women 15 to 29 years of age.
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Oct 05; 141(7):I29. PubMed ID: 15466762
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection: cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
    Habets PC.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar 10; 145(10):499-501. PubMed ID: 11268916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Towards screening for Chlamydia trachomatis].
    Kolmos HJ.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Aug 18; 159(34):5104-5. PubMed ID: 9297316
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.
    Roberts TE, Robinson S, Barton PM, Bryan S, McCarthy A, Macleod J, Egger M, Low N.
    BMJ; 2007 Aug 11; 335(7614):291. PubMed ID: 17656504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.
    Roberts TE, Robinson S, Barton P, Bryan S, Low N, Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group.
    Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Jun 11; 82(3):193-200; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 16731666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Potentials of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Hungary: cost-benefit analysis].
    Nyári T, Mészáros G, Deák J, Nagy E, Kovács L.
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul 02; 141(27):1511-6. PubMed ID: 10943109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
    Norman JE, Wu O, Twaddle S, Macmillan S, McMillan L, Templeton A, McKenzie H, Noone A, Allardice G, Reid M.
    BJOG; 2004 Nov 02; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is Europe ready for STD screening?
    Mårdh PA.
    Genitourin Med; 1997 Apr 02; 73(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 9215088
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis: common misperceptions and misunderstandings.
    Stevens-Simon C, Sheeder J.
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2005 Aug 02; 18(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 16171726
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.