These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study. Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry. Kamantigue ME, Joson PJ, Chen PP. J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 16378016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM. J Glaucoma; 2007 Feb; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Corallo G, Cicinelli S, Papadia M, Bandini F, Uccelli A, Calabria G. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 15(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 16329058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Sample PA, Medeiros FA, Racette L, Pascual JP, Boden C, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes. Hu R, Wang C, Racette L. PLoS One; 2017 Aug; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Parisi L. J Glaucoma; 2006 Apr; 15(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16633218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields. Park HL, Lee J, Park CK. J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma. Kim SA, Park CK, Park HL. Sci Rep; 2022 Jun 17; 12(1):10173. PubMed ID: 35715424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry. Kim TW, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Shah N, Weinreb RN. Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun 17; 114(6):1053-7. PubMed ID: 17239441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]