These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

374 related items for PubMed ID: 11883115

  • 1. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Säbel M, Böhner C, Dobritz M, Wenkel E, Bautz W.
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Säbel M, Böhner C, Dobritz M, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Hundertmark C, Sachs J, Gruhl T, Sperner W, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R, John V, Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Callies R.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C, Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Grabbe E.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
    Lai CJ, Shaw CC, Whitman GJ, Johnston DA, Yang WT, Selinko V, Arribas E, Dogan B, Kappadath SC.
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH.
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Lell M, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Dassel MS, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP, Hundertmark C, Funke M, von Brenndorff A, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast phantom.
    Krug KB, Stützer H, Schröder R, Boecker J, Poggenborg J, Lackner K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):W80-8. PubMed ID: 18716083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
    Hundertmark C, Breiter N, Hermann KP, Funke M, Wiese M, von Heyden D, Grabbe E.
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Bick U, Rogalla P, Blohmer JU, Winzer KJ, Hamm B.
    Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 11885006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.