These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

105 related items for PubMed ID: 11892186

  • 1. New electrode concepts (modiolus-hugging electrodes).
    Lenarz T, Battmer RD, Goldring JE, Neuburger J, Kuzma J, Reuter G.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():347-53. PubMed ID: 11892186
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation.
    Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):153-62. PubMed ID: 3209488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intracellular recording from the primary auditory cortex.
    Nishiyama N, Paolini AG, Shepherd RK.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 57():18-21. PubMed ID: 11892141
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The phenomenon of nystagmus upon electrical stimulation in a cochlear implant patient.
    Wong EC, See HK, Yu HC.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 57():189-91. PubMed ID: 11892145
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Use of stapedius reflex in cochlear implant of congenitally deaf children.
    Ura M, Owa T, Nong D, Fusato N, Noda Y.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000 Mar; 57():165-7. PubMed ID: 11892137
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA, McAnally KI, Xu J, Clark GM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Ash KR, Shallop JK.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.