These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

949 related items for PubMed ID: 11907746

  • 1. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL, Bodner LJ, Ettinger LJ, Siegel RL, Gribbin C, Asch J, Drachtman RA.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique.
    Charles HW, Miguel T, Kovacs S, Gohari A, Arampulikan J, McCann JW.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19875065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
    Teichgräber UK, Streitparth F, Cho CH, Benter T, Gebauer B.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L, Nistri M, Distante V, Rontini M, Manetti A, Stecco A.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
    Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, Rosenblum JD, Burke R, Chang T, Leef JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
    Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Patel KM, Siegel RL, Biswal R, Gribbin CE, Tokarz R.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000 Nov; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
    Schwarz RE, Groeger JS, Coit DG.
    Cancer; 1997 Apr 15; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.
    Dillon PA, Foglia RP.
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep 15; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Central venous access catheters in children with haemophilia.
    Blanchette VS, al-Musa A, Stain AM, Filler RM, Ingram J.
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 1996 Mar 15; 7 Suppl 1():S39-44. PubMed ID: 8735796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Subramaniam A, Kim KH, Bryant SA, Kimball KJ, Huh WK, Straughn JM, Estes JM, Alvarez RD.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct 15; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Totally implantable central venous access devices in pediatric oncology--our experience in 46 patients.
    De Backer A, Vanhulle A, Otten J, Deconinck P.
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1993 Apr 15; 3(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8323914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
    Horattas MC, Trupiano J, Hopkins S, Pasini D, Martino C, Murty A.
    Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb 15; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radiological placement of chest ports in pediatric oncology patients.
    Cil BE.
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov 15; 14(11):2015-9. PubMed ID: 15249980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prophylactic urokinase in the management of long-term venous access devices in children: a Children's Oncology Group study.
    Dillon PW, Jones GR, Bagnall-Reeb HA, Buckley JD, Wiener ES, Haase GM, Children's Oncology Group.
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul 01; 22(13):2718-23. PubMed ID: 15226339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?
    Silas AM, Perrich KD, Hoffer EK, McNulty NJ.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr 01; 17(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 20060749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. PAS-Port: a new implantable vascular access device for arm placement: experiences from the first two years.
    Lundberg G, Wahlberg E, Rickberg A, Olofsson P.
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May 01; 161(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7662775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E, Ragsdale J.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr 01; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
    Lee SH, Chun HJ, Choi BG.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 May 01; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.