These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 11908410

  • 1. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
    Kugel G, Swift EJ, Sorensen JA, Tucker JH, Dunne JT.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I, Marton S, Hegedüs C.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Nam J, Raigrodski AJ, Townsend J, Lepe X, Mancl LA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ, Dogan S, Mancl LA, Heindl H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A, Spencer P, Williams K, Corcoran J.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
    Burke FJ, Crisp RJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US, Grunert I, Kulmer S, Dumfahrt H.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007 Mar; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N, Belser UC, Magne P.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB, Sadan A, Burgess JO, Mercante D, Hoist S.
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Feb; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW, Cheng AC, Khin NT, Lee H, Leong DJ.
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R, Juszczyk AS, Clark RK, Radford DR.
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, Mancl L, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
    Kollefrath R, Savary M, Schwela J.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul 01; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.
    Donovan TE, Chee WW.
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr 01; 48(2):vi-vii, 445-70. PubMed ID: 15172610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Universal paradigms for predictable final impressions.
    Vakay RT, Kois JC.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Mar 01; 26(3):199-200, 202-6; quiz 208-9. PubMed ID: 15813574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of relative humidity on the hydrophilicity of unset elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008 Mar 01; 21(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18350951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Mar 01; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 01; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.