These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
616 related items for PubMed ID: 11931132
1. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations. Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA. Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estrada BE, Brackett WW. Oper Dent; 2010 Jun; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Oper Dent; 2005 Jun; 30(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16130861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer. Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H. Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system--results at three years. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Oper Dent; 2001 Jun; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11203771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Pollington S, van Noort R. Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Oper Dent; 1995 Nov; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]