These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 11932604

  • 1. Immediate versus delayed midface distraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device.
    Weinzweig J, Baker SB, Mackay GJ, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Apr 15; 109(5):1600-10. PubMed ID: 11932604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Maxillary distraction using a trans-sinusal distractor: technical note.
    Nadjmi V, Van Erum R, Schoenaers J, Schepers E.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct 15; 32(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 14759118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices.
    Chin M, Toth BA.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Sep 15; 100(4):819-30; discussion 831-2. PubMed ID: 9290649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
    Kahn DM, Broujerdi J, Schendel SA.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr 15; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The combination of endoscopy and distraction osteogenesis in the development of a canine midface advancement model.
    Levine JP, Rowe NM, Bradley JP, Williams JK, Mackool RJ, Longaker MT, McCarthy JG.
    J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Sep 15; 9(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 9780909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Management of severe maxillary deficiency through distraction osteogenesis with external distraction device].
    Feng Y, Tang Y, Shen G.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Nov 15; 35(6):434-6. PubMed ID: 11780526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.
    Meling TR, Høgevold HE, Due-Tønnessen BJ, Skjelbred P.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb 15; 40(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21109402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.
    Gosain AK, Santoro TD, Havlik RJ, Cohen SR, Holmes RE.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May 15; 109(6):1797-808. PubMed ID: 11994576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting.
    Satoh K, Mitsukawa N, Tosa Y, Kadomatsu K.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov 15; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Achieving differential facial changes with Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: the use of nasal passenger grafts, cerclage hinges, and segmental movements.
    Hopper RA, Prucz RB, Iamphongsai S.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec 15; 130(6):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 22878478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: modification of the intraoral splint in the rigid external distraction.
    Lim H, Ko EW, Lo LJ.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May 15; 23(3):856-8. PubMed ID: 22565908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Wery MF, Nada RM, van der Meulen JJ, Wolvius EB, Ongkosuwito EM.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar 15; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A subcranial Le Fort III advancement with distraction osteogenesis as a clinical strategy to approach pycnodysostosis with midface retrusion and exorbitism.
    Raposo-Amaral CE, Tong A, Denadai R, Yalom A, Raposo-Amaral CA, Bertola D, Li A, Jarrahy R.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul 15; 24(4):1327-30. PubMed ID: 23851800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. LeFort I soft tissue distraction: a hybrid technique.
    Wong GB, Padwa BL.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jul 15; 13(4):572-6; discussion 577. PubMed ID: 12140425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distraction osteogenesis of the midface: a new implantable distraction device.
    Lin KY, Bill TJ.
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999 Jul 15; 9(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 10847977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients.
    Kanno T, Mitsugi M, Hosoe M, Sukegawa S, Yamauchi K, Furuki Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep 15; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.
    Wang XX, Wang X, Yi B, Li ZL, Liang C, Lin Y.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jul 15; 116(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15988247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.