These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


412 related items for PubMed ID: 11941896

  • 1. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Kamat A, Kramer P, Soisson AP.
    W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
    Burnett AF, Lossef SV, Barth KH, Grendys EC, Johnson JC, Barter JF, Barnes WA.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
    Chen PT, Sung CS, Wang CC, Chan KH, Chang WK, Hsu WH.
    J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
    Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, Sofia M, Lombardo R, Cordio S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
    Chang HM, Hsieh HF, Hsu SD, Liao GS, Lin CH, Hsieh CB, Yu JC.
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 01; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
    Henriques HF, Karmy-Jones R, Knoll SM, Copes WS, Giordano JM.
    Am Surg; 1993 Sep 01; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
    Hsu CC, Kwan GN, Evans-Barns H, Rophael JA, van Driel ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug 21; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture. Technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA.
    Chir Ital; 2003 Aug 21; 55(2):313. PubMed ID: 12744114
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Open insertion of right atrial catheters through the jugular veins.
    Raaf JH, Heil D.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep 21; 177(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 8395086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
    Povoski SP.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug 21; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Direct cephalic vein cannulation for safe subclavian access.
    Perry EP, Nash JR, Klidjian AM.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1990 Aug 21; 35(4):218-20. PubMed ID: 2121966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prospective randomized trial comparing implantation of subcutaneous indwelling venous access devices by the cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) approach versus the percutaneous subclavian vein (PSV) approach.
    Povoski SP, Young DC.
    Chir Ital; 2003 Aug 21; 55(1):149-50. PubMed ID: 12633056
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.
    Onders RP, Shenk RR, Stellato TA.
    Am J Surg; 2006 Mar 21; 191(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 16490554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
    Orci LA, Meier RP, Morel P, Staszewicz W, Toso C.
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jan 21; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G, Finco C, Parise P, Savastano S, Vecchiato M, Degregori S, Merigliano S.
    Chir Ital; 2004 Jan 21; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
    Ayadi S, Ksantini R, Maghrebi H, Daghfous A, Ayadi M, Fteriche F, Bedioui H, Chebbi F, Amous A, Jouini M, Kacem M, Mezlini A, Ben Safta Z.
    Tunis Med; 2011 Jan 21; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
    D'Angelo F, Ramacciato G, Caramitti A, Aurello P, Lauro S, Bordin F, Della Casa U.
    Minerva Chir; 1997 Jan 21; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.
    Chang HM, Hsieh CB, Hsieh HF, Chen TW, Chen CJ, Chan DC, Yu JC, Liu YC, Shen KL.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb 21; 32(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 16289481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
    Jablon LK, Ugolini KR, Nahmias NC.
    Am J Surg; 2006 Jul 21; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
    D'Angelo FA, Ramacciato G, Aurello P, De Angelis R, Amodio P, Magrì M, Barillari P.
    Chir Ital; 2002 Jul 21; 54(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12239758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.