These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

463 related items for PubMed ID: 11944479

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
    Tian Y, Li W, Wang Z, Yang N, Hui L, Jiang X.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures.
    Gordon K, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S28-32. PubMed ID: 15732379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S, Šindija B, Aras I, Glunčić M, Trotić R.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Shallop JK, Facer GW, Peterson A.
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A, Lorens A, Polak M, Kostek B, Skarzynski H, Szkielkowska A, Skarzynski PH.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011 Nov; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM, Said NM.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
    Ma RY, Li W, Jiang XJ.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C, Deeks JM, Goehring T, Borsetto D, Bance M, Carlyon RP.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Sep; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK, Brown CJ, Etler CP, O'Brien S, Chiou LK, Abbas PJ.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.