These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


98 related items for PubMed ID: 11956305

  • 1. Comparison of the results of radical hysterectomy: sequential observations in each period.
    Kobamatsu Y, Yamamoto R, Kaneuchi M, Mitamura T, Minobe S, Todo Y, Takeda M, Okamoto K, Nomura E, Negishi H, Sakuragi N, Fujimoto S.
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 Mar; 32(3):103-7. PubMed ID: 11956305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Jensen JK, Lucci JA, DiSaia PJ, Manetta A, Berman ML.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 8244174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pharmacokinetics of cephem antibiotics in exudate of pelvic retroperitoneal space after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Ito K, Hayasaki M, Tamaya T.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1990 Jun; 34(6):1160-4. PubMed ID: 2393276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Antibiotic prophylaxis for radical abdominal hysterectomy.
    Bendvold E, Kjorstad KE.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1987 Oct; 28(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 3666577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prophylactic topical cefamandole in radical hysterectomy.
    Miyazawa K, Hernandez E, Dillon MB.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Apr; 25(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 2884138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative efficacy of short-term versus long-term cefoxitin prophylaxis against postoperative infection after radical hysterectomy: a prospective study.
    Sevin BU, Ramos R, Gerhardt RT, Guerra L, Hilsenbeck S, Averette HE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):729-34. PubMed ID: 2014087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, Perone C, Fusco A, Cicinelli E, Nezhat F.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.