These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
118 related items for PubMed ID: 11957000
1. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis. Morasch MD, Gurjala AN, Washington E, Chiou AC, Simonetti OP, Finn JP, Yao JS. Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H, Jung EM, Flach PM, Strautz TI, Clevert DA, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO. Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G, Stordahl N, Linden C, Johnson BL, Bandyk DF. J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging to evaluate carotid artery stenosis: comparison with magnetic resonance angiography. Igase K, Kumon Y, Matsubara I, Arai M, Goishi J, Watanabe H, Ohnishi T, Sadamoto K. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 25440325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital. Korteweg MA, Kerkhoff H, Bakker J, Elgersma OE. Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography. Jackson MR, Chang AS, Robles HA, Gillespie DL, Olsen SB, Kaiser WJ, Goff JM, O'Donnell SD, Rich NM. Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting. Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, Modrall JG, Smith S, Clagett GP. J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive evaluation of collateral blood flow through circle of Willis in cervical carotid stenosis using selective magnetic resonance angiography. Ito K, Sasaki M, Kobayashi M, Ogasawara K, Nishihara T, Takahashi T, Natori T, Uwano I, Yamashita F, Kudo K. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 24103664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical validation of an automated vessel-segmentation software of the extracranial-carotid arteries based on 3D-MRA: a prospective study. Guzman R, Lovblad KO, Altrichter S, Remonda L, de Koning P, Andres RH, El-Koussy M, Kelly ME, Reiber JH, Schroth G, Oswald H, Barth A. J Neuroradiol; 2008 Dec; 35(5):278-85. PubMed ID: 18707758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]