These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 11957319

  • 1. Interobserver errors in anthropometry.
    Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Tsuzuki K, Yokoi T.
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1999 Dec; 28(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 11957319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Random errors in anthropometry.
    Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Tsuzuki K, Yokoi T.
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1996 Dec; 25(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 9735595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.
    Jamison PL, Ward RE.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 8476006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry.
    Kouchi M, Mochimaru M.
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Mar; 42(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 20947062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Multiple observers, humidity, and choice of precision statistics: factors influencing craniometric data quality.
    Utermohle CJ, Zegura SL, Heathcote GM.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1983 May; 61(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 6869516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.
    Anderson N, Humphries N, Wells JE.
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Apr; 49(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 15845044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measurement of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error.
    Choudhari NS, George R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Dudeja N.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18708256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anthropometry in health assessment: the importance of measurement error.
    Ulijaszek SJ, Lourie JA.
    Coll Antropol; 1997 Dec; 21(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 9439059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ, Byrd JE.
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in a multicenter study in adolescents.
    Nagy E, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Manios Y, Béghin L, Iliescu C, Censi L, Dietrich S, Ortega FB, De Vriendt T, Plada M, Moreno LA, Molnar D, HELENA Study Group.
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Nov; 32 Suppl 5():S58-65. PubMed ID: 19011655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of two or more measurement techniques to a standard.
    Proschan MA, Leifer ES.
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 16750939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of measuring waist circumference.
    Nádas J, Putz Z, Kolev G, Nagy S, Jermendy G.
    Med Sci Monit; 2008 Jan; 14(1):CR15-18. PubMed ID: 18160939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Repeatability and interobserver error of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurements made by experts.
    Voracek M, Manning JT, Dressler SG.
    Am J Hum Biol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):142-6. PubMed ID: 17160984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.